Tale of Two Advisory Committees:
Programs have to have Advisory Meetings. It is the way that education game is set up. Just like you can always tell a good restaurant by the salad they serve you can tell an academic program by the Advisory Meeting they hold.
Too many institutions go through the form because they have to but the meeting has little or no impact on the program or plans of the group. The meeting is orchestrated with a firm hand of the rains and an eye to the hidden agenda.
The Community College Advisory Meeting was of this type with thinly veiled territorial snipping going on between the computer department and the art department and the cherry picking of industry suggestions that support their current plans the rule of the day. They will have the same meeting every year and then get on with their life. The food was okay.
LCAD, new program, the head of the department is hungry to get it right. The caliber of industry professionals is first rate with people high up in the gaming industry. Art Directors, Recruiters, people who hire the artist that this program wants to turn out.
The note taking is meticulous, opinions are solicited in all areas not just areas needed to support current plans. Changes are made to the curriculum right there in the Advisory Meeting because the ideas are valid and make sense and will change the program for the better.
One of these ideas that was put forth and adopted was the gating concept. There is a portfolio review to get into the program. But that is it. Once you are in you are in. If you pass all of your classes then you graduate. No matter how good your artwork.
The Gating concept is for an end of second year review. You have to pass the review to continue in the program. If you don`t pass the Gate you go on probation with a program designed to deal with the weak areas of the portfolio. Some students may be told to rethink their career plan because they just don`t have the chops.
It is a very bold move for any school. It is a long-term strategy for program excellence that most college do not dare to adopt. Schools run on tuition, money in the bank to pay the bills and salaries. Lots of schools live on people with big dreams who do not have the talent to back them up.
To have industry and instruction judge fitness of the student`s work at the half way mark before the school has gotten 4 year`s tuition out of each and every student can be harmful to the cash flow in the short run.
In the long run the Gate Review creates a higher standard for the program and will increase the value of the degree over time thus increasing the quality and quantity of students seeking enrollment. The Gate Review also improves the work of the student because they know they have to do their best to get past the review.
The first Gate Review meeting for the LCAD Game Art program was scheduled to be held at next year`s Advisory Board Meeting. More than just the food was good that this Advisory Meeting. I am impressed, I am proud to be part of this board and this program. These students are going to be so employable. This program is going to be so hot. This degree is going to mean something. I can tell just by the salad what this restaurant serves.





